HAP vs RSX
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Russia ETF
Which is better, HAP or RSX?
HAP has been ahead.
HAP has a lower expense ratio. HAP led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAP | RSX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41%Best | 0.83% |
| AUM | $335M | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.87% | 401.36% |
| Holdings | 131 | 31 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1%Best | 37.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.7%Best | -82.2% |
| $10,000 over 14.4 years | $19,189Best | $2,334 |
| Fund Family | VanEck | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 29, 2008 | Apr 24, 2007 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 1371 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. HAP has data through Oct 14, 2026 and RSX through Jan 12, 2023.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 14.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 3, 2008 to Jan 12, 2023 (14.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.7% compared with 21.1% for HAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.7% for HAP and -82.2% for RSX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAP charges 0.41% per year while RSX charges 0.83%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $83 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAP currently yields 1.87% against 401.36% for RSX.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HAP and RSX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAP or RSX?
HAP has an expense ratio of 0.41% while RSX charges 0.83%. HAP is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, HAP or RSX?
RSX has been the more volatile fund at 37.7% annualized versus 21.1% for HAP. Worst drawdown: HAP -50.7% vs RSX -82.2%.
Should I hold both HAP and RSX?
HAP and RSX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAP or RSX?
HAP yields 1.87% while RSX yields 401.36%, so RSX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSX better than HAP?
HAP has a lower expense ratio. HAP led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.