HELS vs VYM

HELS vs VYM

Which is better, HELS or VYM?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHELSVYM
Expense Ratio0.70%0.04%Best
AUM$19M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.02%2.22%
Holdings51613
YTD Return-6.26%+13.15%Best
1Y Return-+17.82%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.99%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.16%
Top 10 Weight43.5%25.9%Best
Fund FamilyHedgeye Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionDec 10, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HELS vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

HELS vs VYM Performance

Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS) is an ETF from Hedgeye Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, HELS is down 6.26% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HELS charges 0.70% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $4 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HELS currently yields 0.02% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

HELS already in VYM25.4%
VYM already in HELS17.9%

25.4% of HELS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 17.9% of VYM's money is in holdings HELS also owns.

HELS and VYM share little of their money.

16 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in HELS and 603 in VYM, against full books of 51 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 552 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for HELS (79.5% of the fund), and 31 for HELS that do not appear in VYM (70.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HELSWeight in VYMDifference
JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co.2.96%3.38%0.42%
JNJJohnson & Johnson1.77%2.54%0.77%
XOMExxon Mobil Corp.1.49%2.36%0.87%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.1.99%1.17%0.82%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc.1.57%1.56%0.01%
MSMorgan Stanley2.02%0.97%1.05%
KOCoca Cola Co.1.57%1.31%0.26%
MRKMerck & Co. Inc.1.56%1.32%0.24%
VLOValero Energy Corp.2.04%0.32%1.72%
DELLDell Technologies Inc.1.72%0.54%1.18%

25.4% of HELS is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HELSVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HELS or VYM?

HELS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HELS and VYM?

25.4% of HELS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 17.9% of VYM's is in holdings HELS also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in HELS and 603 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, HELS or VYM?

HELS yields 0.02% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than HELS?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.