ILDR vs IVV
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ILDR or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ILDR led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ILDR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $318M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 164 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +14.56%Best | +11.03% |
| 1Y Return | +18.77%Best | +15.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.00%Best | +20.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.78% | +12.61%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.3% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.6% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,684 | $18,109Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 25, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 26, 2021 to Sep 16, 2026 (5.3 years).
ILDR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ILDR vs IVV Performance
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ILDR returned +18.77% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, ILDR is up 14.56% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Over three years, ILDR compounded at +29.00% per year against +20.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.78% and +12.61% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ILDR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.6% for ILDR and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ILDR charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ILDR currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
61.2% of ILDR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 35.7% of IVV's money is in holdings ILDR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in ILDR and 490 in IVV, against full books of 164 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 452 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ILDR (63.0% of the fund), and 39 for ILDR that do not appear in IVV (25.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ILDR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.84% | 8.07% | 1.77% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.51% | 3.84% | 1.67% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.74% | 3.00% | 1.74% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.93% | 5.69% | 3.76% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.74% | 2.65% | 1.09% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.33% | 1.16% | 3.17% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.07% | 1.38% | 1.69% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.67% | 1.63% | 1.04% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.87% | 1.90% | 0.03% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.87% | 1.56% | 0.31% |
61.2% of ILDR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ILDR or IVV?
ILDR has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ILDR or IVV?
Over the past year ILDR returned +18.77% vs +15.62% for IVV, so ILDR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ILDR or IVV?
ILDR has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ILDR -44.6% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both ILDR and IVV?
ILDR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ILDR and IVV?
61.2% of ILDR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 35.7% of IVV's is in holdings ILDR also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in ILDR and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ILDR or IVV?
ILDR yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ILDR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ILDR led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.