ILDR vs VOO
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ILDR or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ILDR led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ILDR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $318M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 164 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +14.39%Best | +11.98% |
| 1Y Return | +18.54%Best | +16.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.72%Best | +21.19% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.04% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.3% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.6% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,881 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 25, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 26, 2021 to Sep 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
ILDR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ILDR vs VOO Performance
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ILDR returned +18.54% while VOO returned +16.45%. Year to date, ILDR is up 14.39% versus a gain of 11.98% for VOO.
Over three years, ILDR compounded at +28.72% per year against +21.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.04% and +12.95% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ILDR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 15.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.6% for ILDR and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ILDR charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ILDR currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
63.0% of ILDR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 35.0% of VOO's money is in holdings ILDR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
31 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in ILDR and 494 in VOO, against full books of 164 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 456 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ILDR (64.1% of the fund), and 38 for ILDR that do not appear in VOO (23.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ILDR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.84% | 7.55% | 2.29% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.51% | 4.13% | 1.38% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.74% | 3.24% | 1.50% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.93% | 5.36% | 3.43% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.74% | 2.86% | 0.88% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.33% | 1.21% | 3.12% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.07% | 1.41% | 1.66% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.67% | 1.44% | 1.23% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.87% | 1.90% | 0.03% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.87% | 1.36% | 0.51% |
63.0% of ILDR is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ILDR or VOO?
ILDR has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ILDR or VOO?
Over the past year ILDR returned +18.54% vs +16.45% for VOO, so ILDR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ILDR or VOO?
ILDR has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 15.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ILDR -44.6% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both ILDR and VOO?
ILDR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ILDR and VOO?
63.0% of ILDR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 35.0% of VOO's is in holdings ILDR also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in ILDR and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, ILDR or VOO?
ILDR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than ILDR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ILDR led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.