IVRS vs VTI
iShares Future Metaverse Tech and Communications ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVRS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.57% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 48 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -6.74% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.71% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.39% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 14, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
IVRS vs VTI Performance
iShares Future Metaverse Tech and Communications ETF (IVRS) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVRS returned -12.71% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, IVRS is down 6.74% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, IVRS compounded at +9.39% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVRS has the edge at +11.64% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.4% for IVRS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVRS charges 0.47% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVRS currently yields 8.57% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IVRS and VTI share 18 holdings out of 2806 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVRS or VTI?
IVRS has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVRS or VTI?
Over the past year IVRS returned -12.71% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVRS annualized +11.64% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVRS or VTI?
IVRS has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IVRS -31.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IVRS and VTI?
IVRS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVRS and VTI?
IVRS and VTI share 18 common holdings with a 7.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2806 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVRS or VTI?
IVRS yields 8.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IVRS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.