IVRS vs QQQ
iShares Future Metaverse Tech and Communications ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVRS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $8M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.57% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 48 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -6.74% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.71% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.39% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 14, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IVRS vs QQQ Performance
iShares Future Metaverse Tech and Communications ETF (IVRS) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVRS returned -12.71% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, IVRS is down 6.74% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, IVRS compounded at +9.39% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +11.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.6% for IVRS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.4% for IVRS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVRS charges 0.47% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $18 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVRS currently yields 8.57% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVRS and QQQ share 10 holdings out of 129 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVRS or QQQ?
IVRS has an expense ratio of 0.47% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVRS or QQQ?
Over the past year IVRS returned -12.71% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVRS annualized +11.64% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVRS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.6% for IVRS. Worst drawdown: IVRS -31.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IVRS and QQQ?
IVRS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVRS and QQQ?
IVRS and QQQ share 10 common holdings with a 9.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 129 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVRS or QQQ?
IVRS yields 8.57% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IVRS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.