IVRS vs IVV
iShares Future Metaverse Tech and Communications ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVRS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.57% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 48 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -6.74% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.71% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.39% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 14, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
IVRS vs IVV Performance
iShares Future Metaverse Tech and Communications ETF (IVRS) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVRS returned -12.71% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, IVRS is down 6.74% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, IVRS compounded at +9.39% per year against +22.08% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVRS has the edge at +11.64% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.4% for IVRS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVRS charges 0.47% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVRS currently yields 8.57% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IVRS and IVV share 14 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVRS or IVV?
IVRS has an expense ratio of 0.47% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVRS or IVV?
Over the past year IVRS returned -12.71% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVRS annualized +11.64% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVRS or IVV?
IVRS has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVRS -31.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IVRS and IVV?
IVRS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVRS and IVV?
IVRS and IVV share 14 common holdings with a 8.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVRS or IVV?
IVRS yields 8.57% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVRS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.