IVV vs IWLG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | IWLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $334M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 42 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +4.03% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +9.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +21.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 19.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -23.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | New York Life Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 22, 2022 |
IVV vs IWLG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) is a ETF from New York Life Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while IWLG returned +9.27%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 4.03% for IWLG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +21.65% for IWLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, IWLG has the edge at +21.35% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.2% for IWLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while IWLG charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for IWLG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and IWLG share 35 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 40.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or IWLG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IWLG charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or IWLG?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +9.27% for IWLG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +21.35% for IWLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or IWLG?
IWLG has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs IWLG -23.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and IWLG?
IVV and IWLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and IWLG?
IVV and IWLG share 35 common holdings with a 40.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or IWLG?
IVV yields 1.10% while IWLG yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.