IVV vs JAVA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Which is better, IVV or JAVA?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, JAVA over 1Y. JAVA is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JAVA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.44% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $7.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.18% |
| Holdings | 508 | 155 |
| YTD Return | +12.27% | +12.62%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.04% | +19.83%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24%Best | +16.88% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08%Best | +11.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -16.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,490Best | $17,529 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 28.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 4, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 5, 2021 to Sep 17, 2026 (5 years).
IVV vs JAVA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs JAVA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while JAVA returned +19.83%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 12.62% for JAVA.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.24% per year against +16.88% for JAVA; over five years the annualized figures are +13.08% and +11.88% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 14.4% for JAVA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -16.5% for JAVA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JAVA charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $44 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.18% for JAVA.
Holdings Overlap
56.6% of IVV's money is in holdings JAVA also owns. 90.0% of JAVA's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of JAVA is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
129 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 155 in JAVA, against full books of 508 and 155.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 21 positions for JAVA that do not appear in our book for IVV (8.5% of the fund), and 353 for IVV that do not appear in JAVA (42.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in JAVA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 5.87% | 0.18% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 7.27% | 3.43% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 3.05% | 3.97% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 0.57% | 7.50% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 1.81% | 0.09% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.61% | 2.46% | 1.85% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.39% | 1.46% | 0.07% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 0.35% | 2.04% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 0.40% | 2.23% | 1.83% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 1.17% | 0.20% |
90.0% of JAVA is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JAVA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JAVA charges 0.44%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or JAVA?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +19.83% for JAVA, so JAVA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or JAVA?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 14.4% for JAVA. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs JAVA -16.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and JAVA?
IVV and JAVA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JAVA?
90.0% of JAVA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 90.0% of JAVA's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 129 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 155 in JAVA.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JAVA?
IVV yields 1.06% while JAVA yields 1.18%, so JAVA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JAVA better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, JAVA over 1Y. JAVA is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.