IVV vs JGRO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JGRO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.44% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $9.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.09% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 120 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +3.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +6.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +20.20% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 8, 2022 |
IVV vs JGRO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while JGRO returned +6.95%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 3.80% for JGRO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +20.20% for JGRO. Across the full 4-year window we track, JGRO has the edge at +18.24% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.7% for JGRO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JGRO charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $44 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.09% for JGRO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JGRO share 87 holdings out of 546 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JGRO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JGRO charges 0.44%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JGRO?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +6.95% for JGRO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +18.24% for JGRO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JGRO?
JGRO has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JGRO -22.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and JGRO?
IVV and JGRO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JGRO?
IVV and JGRO share 87 common holdings with a 46.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 546 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JGRO?
IVV yields 1.09% while JGRO yields 0.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.