IVV vs JHDG

IVV vs JHDG

Which is better, IVV or JHDG?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVJHDG
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.49%
AUM$876.4B$107M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.10%
Holdings508117
YTD Return+12.27%Best+8.84%
1Y Return+17.04%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.24%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.08%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%Best47.9%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)John Hancock Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Apr 8, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs JHDG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs JHDG Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 8.84% for JHDG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while JHDG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.10% for JHDG.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in JHDG38.3%
JHDG already in IVV82.6%

38.3% of IVV's money is in holdings JHDG also owns. 82.6% of JHDG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

Most of JHDG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

35 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 54 in JHDG, against full books of 508 and 117.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 9 positions for JHDG that do not appear in our book for IVV (9.0% of the fund), and 447 for IVV that do not appear in JHDG (60.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in JHDGDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.69%8.63%2.94%
NVDANvidia Corp8.07%5.19%2.88%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.84%6.38%2.54%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.00%7.13%4.13%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.65%3.98%1.33%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.44%4.44%3.00%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity1.39%2.91%1.52%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.38%2.91%1.53%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.0.63%3.48%2.85%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.16%2.80%1.64%

82.6% of JHDG is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVJHDG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or JHDG?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JHDG charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JHDG?

82.6% of JHDG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 82.6% of JHDG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 54 in JHDG.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JHDG?

IVV yields 1.06% while JHDG yields 0.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JHDG better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.