IVV vs LRGE

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVLRGEWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.48%
AUM$865.2B$362M
Dividend Yield1.09%0.12%
Holdings50830
YTD Return+13.80%+7.42%
1Y Return+23.70%+11.47%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+17.76%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+9.84%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%18.1%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-37.0%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Franklin Templeton Investments (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000May 22, 2017

IVV vs LRGE Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while LRGE returned +11.47%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 7.42% for LRGE.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +17.76% for LRGE; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +9.84% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, LRGE has the edge at +15.34% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LRGE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -37.0% for LRGE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while LRGE charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $48 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.12% for LRGE.

Holdings Overlap

30.6%overlap

IVV and LRGE share 25 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 30.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in LRGEDifference
NVDA7.76%15.38%7.62%
AAPL7.44%8.14%0.70%
AMZN3.75%7.49%3.74%
METAProProPro
PANWProProPro
TSLAProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
VProProPro
NFLXProProPro
ABNBProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with LRGE
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or LRGE?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LRGE charges 0.48%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or LRGE?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +11.47% for LRGE, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +15.34% for LRGE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or LRGE?

LRGE has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LRGE -37.0%.

Should I hold both IVV and LRGE?

IVV and LRGE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LRGE?

IVV and LRGE share 25 common holdings with a 30.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LRGE?

IVV yields 1.09% while LRGE yields 0.12%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →