IVV vs MINN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MINN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.25% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $49M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.10% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 127 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | -2.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +2.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +2.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | -0.97% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -18.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Mairs & Power | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 11, 2021 |
IVV vs MINN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) is a ETF from Mairs & Power. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while MINN returned +2.45%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a loss of 2.47% for MINN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +2.94% for MINN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and -0.97% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -0.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.7% for MINN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -18.4% for MINN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MINN charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $25 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.10% for MINN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MINN share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MINN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MINN charges 0.25%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MINN?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +2.45% for MINN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs -0.61% for MINN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MINN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.7% for MINN. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MINN -18.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and MINN?
IVV and MINN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MINN?
IVV and MINN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MINN?
IVV yields 1.10% while MINN yields 3.10%, so MINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.