MINN vs VXUS
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MINN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $48M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.05% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 117 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -2.02% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.87% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.85% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.90% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Mairs & Power | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MINN vs VXUS Performance
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) is a ETF from Mairs & Power and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MINN returned +2.87% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, MINN is down 2.02% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, MINN compounded at +2.85% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -0.90% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -0.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.8% for MINN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for MINN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MINN charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MINN currently yields 3.05% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MINN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7867 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MINN or VXUS?
MINN has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MINN or VXUS?
Over the past year MINN returned +2.87% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), MINN annualized -0.53% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MINN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.8% for MINN. Worst drawdown: MINN -18.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MINN and VXUS?
MINN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MINN and VXUS?
MINN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7867 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MINN or VXUS?
MINN yields 3.05% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so MINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.