MINN vs VYM
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MINN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $48M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.05% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 117 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -1.93% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.61% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.80% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.86% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Mairs & Power | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MINN vs VYM Performance
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) is a ETF from Mairs & Power and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MINN returned +2.61% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, MINN is down 1.93% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, MINN compounded at +2.80% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.86% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.11% annualized vs -0.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 7.8% for MINN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for MINN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MINN charges 0.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $4 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MINN currently yields 3.05% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MINN and VYM share 0 holdings out of 564 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MINN or VYM?
MINN has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MINN or VYM?
Over the past year MINN returned +2.61% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), MINN annualized -0.52% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MINN or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 7.8% for MINN. Worst drawdown: MINN -18.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MINN and VYM?
MINN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MINN and VYM?
MINN and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 564 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MINN or VYM?
MINN yields 3.05% while VYM yields 2.86%, so MINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.