IVV vs NECK

IVV vs NECK

Which is better, IVV or NECK?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.2%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVNECK
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.75%
AUM$896.5B$14M
Dividend Yield1.10%0.00%
Holdings50820
YTD Return+12.65%Best-18.12%
1Y Return+16.83%-
3Y Return (annualized)+22.09%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.87%-
Top 10 Weight38.9%Best67.2%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)WallStreetX ETFs, Inc.
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 22, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs NECK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs NECK Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and xETFs AI Bottlenecks ETF (NECK) is an ETF from WallStreetX ETFs, Inc.. Year to date, IVV is up 12.65% versus a loss of 18.12% for NECK.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while NECK charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for NECK.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in NECK5.9%
NECK already in IVV50.0%

5.9% of IVV's money is in holdings NECK also owns. 50.0% of NECK's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

9 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 20 in NECK, against full books of 508 and 20.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 6 positions for NECK that do not appear in our book for IVV (23.8% of the fund), and 491 for IVV that do not appear in NECK (93.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in NECKDifference
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.87%7.38%5.51%
LITELumentum Holdings Inc0.14%8.69%8.55%
COHRCoherent, Inc0.09%7.96%7.87%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.47%3.81%1.34%
GEVGe Vernova, Inc.0.40%4.69%4.29%
MRVLMarvell Technology Inc0.35%4.67%4.32%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock0.32%4.45%4.13%
VRTVertiv Holdings Co0.14%4.38%4.24%
BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A0.12%3.95%3.83%

50.0% of NECK is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVNECK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or NECK?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NECK charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NECK?

50.0% of NECK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 50.0% of NECK's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 20 in NECK.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NECK?

IVV yields 1.10% while NECK yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NECK better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.