IVV vs NOBL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Which is better, IVV or NOBL?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. NOBL is less concentrated, with 16.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $11.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.01% |
| Holdings | 508 | 69 |
| YTD Return | +13.60%Best | +4.47% |
| 1Y Return | +16.32%Best | +6.35% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.81%Best | +9.65% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03%Best | +6.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -35.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,279Best | $13,433 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1% | 16.7%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 9, 2013 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 10, 2013 to Oct 2, 2026 (13 years).
IVV vs NOBL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NOBL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +16.32% while NOBL returned +6.35%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.60% versus a gain of 4.47% for NOBL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.81% per year against +9.65% for NOBL; over five years the annualized figures are +14.03% and +6.08% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +8.75%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 14.1% for NOBL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -35.4% for NOBL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NOBL charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.01% for NOBL.
Holdings Overlap
10.9% of IVV's money is in holdings NOBL also owns. 99.8% of NOBL's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of NOBL is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
69 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 69 in NOBL, against full books of 508 and 69.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 69 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 428 positions NOBL does not, 88.3% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.00%, AAPL 7.39%, MSFT 5.57%, AMZN 3.80%, GOOGL 3.00%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NOBL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.04% | 1.54% | 0.50% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 1.51% | 0.54% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.61% | 1.59% | 0.98% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.69% | 1.49% | 0.80% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.71% | 1.44% | 0.73% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 0.35% | 1.75% | 1.40% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.52% | 1.56% | 1.04% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.51% | 1.42% | 0.91% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.57% | 1.27% | 0.70% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.18% | 1.66% | 1.48% |
99.8% of NOBL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NOBL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NOBL charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NOBL?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.32% vs +6.35% for NOBL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IVV annualized +13.06% vs +8.75% for NOBL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NOBL?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 14.1% for NOBL. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs NOBL -35.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and NOBL?
IVV and NOBL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NOBL?
99.8% of NOBL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 99.8% of NOBL's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 69 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 69 in NOBL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NOBL?
IVV yields 1.06% while NOBL yields 2.01%, so NOBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NOBL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. NOBL is less concentrated, with 16.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.