IVV vs NOBL

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVNOBLWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.35%
AUM$865.2B$11.8B
Dividend Yield1.09%2.07%
Holdings50870
YTD Return+13.80%+12.40%
1Y Return+23.70%+15.29%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+9.09%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+6.83%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%14.1%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-35.4%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)ProShares
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 9, 2013

IVV vs NOBL Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while NOBL returned +15.29%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 12.40% for NOBL.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +9.09% for NOBL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +6.83% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, NOBL has the edge at +9.48% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.1% for NOBL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -35.4% for NOBL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while NOBL charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.07% for NOBL.

Holdings Overlap

10.9%overlap

IVV and NOBL share 69 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in NOBLDifference
JNJ0.93%1.57%0.64%
ABBV0.70%1.70%1.00%
CAT0.63%1.66%1.03%
XOMProProPro
KOProProPro
PGProProPro
WMTProProPro
IBMProProPro
LIN:IEProProPro
WSTProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with NOBL
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or NOBL?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NOBL charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or NOBL?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +15.29% for NOBL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +9.48% for NOBL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or NOBL?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.1% for NOBL. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NOBL -35.4%.

Should I hold both IVV and NOBL?

IVV and NOBL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NOBL?

IVV and NOBL share 69 common holdings with a 10.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NOBL?

IVV yields 1.09% while NOBL yields 2.07%, so NOBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →