IVV vs NULG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NULG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.26% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $2.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.10% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 71 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +16.45% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +18.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +23.23% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +12.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -36.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Nuveen | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 13, 2016 |
IVV vs NULG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) is a ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while NULG returned +18.30%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 16.45% for NULG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +23.23% for NULG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +12.24% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, NULG has the edge at +18.62% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NULG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -36.2% for NULG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NULG charges 0.26%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $26 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.10% for NULG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NULG share 55 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NULG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NULG charges 0.26%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NULG?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +18.30% for NULG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +18.62% for NULG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NULG?
NULG has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NULG -36.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and NULG?
IVV and NULG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NULG?
IVV and NULG share 55 common holdings with a 22.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NULG?
IVV yields 1.10% while NULG yields 0.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.