IVV vs PFOE

IVV vs PFOE

Which is better, IVV or PFOE?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.3%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPFOE
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.59%
AUM$886.7B$91M
Dividend Yield1.10%0.22%
Holdings50825
YTD Return+13.86%Best-6.95%
1Y Return+21.57%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.48%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.88%-
Top 10 Weight37.9%Best53.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Pathfinder ETFs
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 31, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs PFOE growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs PFOE Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) is an ETF from Pathfinder ETFs. Year to date, IVV is up 13.86% versus a loss of 6.95% for PFOE.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PFOE charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.22% for PFOE.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in PFOE7.4%
PFOE already in IVV48.2%

7.4% of IVV's money is in holdings PFOE also owns. 48.2% of PFOE's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

12 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 23 in PFOE, against full books of 508 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 6 positions for PFOE that do not appear in our book for IVV (24.7% of the fund), and 485 for IVV that do not appear in PFOE (91.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in PFOEDifference
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.56%4.85%2.29%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.39%4.27%2.88%
NFLXNetflix, Inc.0.47%4.72%4.25%
UBERUber Technologies Inc0.21%4.97%4.76%
UNHUnitedhealth Group, Inc.0.56%4.48%3.92%
IDXXIdexx Labs0.07%4.96%4.89%
ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc.0.20%4.31%4.11%
VVisa Inc Class A0.92%3.47%2.55%
MAMastercard Inc0.69%3.48%2.79%
INTUIntuit, Inc.0.14%3.77%3.63%

48.2% of PFOE is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVPFOE

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PFOE?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PFOE charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PFOE?

48.2% of PFOE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 48.2% of PFOE's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 23 in PFOE.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PFOE?

IVV yields 1.10% while PFOE yields 0.22%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PFOE better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.