IVV vs PJBF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PJBF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $11M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.21% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 44 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +7.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +11.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -25.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | PGIM Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 14, 2023 |
IVV vs PJBF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) is a ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while PJBF returned +11.43%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 7.20% for PJBF.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PJBF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -25.7% for PJBF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PJBF charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.21% for PJBF.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PJBF share 17 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PJBF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PJBF charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PJBF?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +11.43% for PJBF, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +11.98% for PJBF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PJBF?
PJBF has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PJBF -25.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and PJBF?
IVV and PJBF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PJBF?
IVV and PJBF share 17 common holdings with a 26.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PJBF?
IVV yields 1.09% while PJBF yields 0.21%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.