IVV vs QBIG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco Top QQQ ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QBIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.29% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $33M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 17 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +8.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +16.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 24.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -30.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 4, 2024 |
IVV vs QBIG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while QBIG returned +16.19%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 8.87% for QBIG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QBIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -30.3% for QBIG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QBIG charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $29 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for QBIG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QBIG share 8 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 31.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QBIG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QBIG charges 0.29%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QBIG?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +16.19% for QBIG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +19.70% for QBIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QBIG?
QBIG has been the more volatile fund at 24.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QBIG -30.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and QBIG?
IVV and QBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QBIG?
IVV and QBIG share 8 common holdings with a 31.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QBIG?
IVV yields 1.09% while QBIG yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.