IVV vs QQHG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
Which is better, IVV or QQHG?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQHG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.26% |
| Holdings | 508 | 503 |
| YTD Return | +13.60%Best | +12.32% |
| 1Y Return | +16.32%Best | +14.19% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6% | 10.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -6.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,945Best | $13,528 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 50.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 7, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 7, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.4 years).
IVV vs QQHG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QQHG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +16.32% while QQHG returned +14.19%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.60% versus a gain of 12.32% for QQHG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.6% compared with 10.5% for QQHG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -6.2% for QQHG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQHG charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.26% for QQHG.
Holdings Overlap
65.3% of IVV's money is in holdings QQHG also owns. 85.6% of QQHG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of QQHG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
143 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 221 in QQHG, against full books of 508 and 503.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 73 positions for QQHG that do not appear in our book for IVV (9.4% of the fund), and 354 for IVV that do not appear in QQHG (34.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QQHG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.00% | 8.40% | 0.40% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.39% | 7.68% | 0.29% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.57% | 6.38% | 0.81% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.80% | 4.39% | 0.59% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.40% | 5.71% | 3.31% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.66% | 4.77% | 3.11% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.59% | 2.84% | 0.25% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.15% | 3.22% | 1.07% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.27% | 3.76% | 2.49% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 2.99% | 1.43% |
85.6% of QQHG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQHG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQHG charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QQHG?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.32% vs +14.19% for QQHG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +26.81% vs +24.09% for QQHG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQHG?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.6% annualized versus 10.5% for QQHG. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs QQHG -6.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQHG?
IVV and QQHG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQHG?
85.6% of QQHG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 85.6% of QQHG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 143 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 221 in QQHG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQHG?
IVV yields 1.06% while QQHG yields 0.26%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQHG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.