IVV vs QQHG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
Which is better, IVV or QQHG?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQHG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $850.0B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.20% |
| Holdings | 1,018 | 512 |
| YTD Return | +12.12%Best | +8.92% |
| 1Y Return | +12.53%Best | +7.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.93% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.5% | 11.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -7.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $13,738Best | $13,098 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 7, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 7, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.5 years).
IVV vs QQHG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QQHG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% while QQHG returned +7.61%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.12% versus a gain of 8.92% for QQHG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.5% compared with 11.1% for QQHG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -7.9% for QQHG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQHG charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.20% for QQHG.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and QQHG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQHG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQHG charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QQHG?
Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% vs +7.61% for QQHG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +23.58% vs +19.71% for QQHG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQHG?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.5% annualized versus 11.1% for QQHG. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs QQHG -7.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQHG?
IVV and QQHG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQHG?
IVV yields 1.09% while QQHG yields 0.20%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQHG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.