IVV vs QQQG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQQG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQQG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $45M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.05% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 52 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +27.97% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +36.74% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 22.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -23.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 19, 2024 |
IVV vs QQQG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while QQQG returned +36.74%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 27.97% for QQQG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.6% for QQQG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQQG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.05% for QQQG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQQG share 47 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQQG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQG charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQQG?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +36.74% for QQQG, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +22.61% for QQQG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQQG?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQQG -23.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQQG?
IVV and QQQG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQQG?
IVV and QQQG share 47 common holdings with a 16.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQQG?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQQG yields 0.05%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.