QQQG vs VYM
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QQQG or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $43M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 51 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +25.41%Best | +13.91% |
| 1Y Return | +30.40%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 10.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,850Best | $13,943 |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.7% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.1 years).
QQQG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QQQG vs VYM Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQG returned +30.40% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, QQQG is up 25.41% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 10.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.05% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
22.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 14.3% of VYM's money is in holdings QQQG also owns.
QQQG and VYM share little of their money.
11 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 603 in VYM, against full books of 51 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 603 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 557 positions QQQG does not, 83.2% of the fund.
Largest: JPM 3.38%, JNJ 2.54%, XOM 2.36%, CAT 2.01%, ABBV 1.85%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.67% | 7.29% | 5.62% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.67% | 1.93% | 0.74% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 3.39% | 1.13% | 2.26% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 3.15% | 0.80% | 2.35% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 2.08% | 0.75% | 1.33% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc. | 2.32% | 0.14% | 2.18% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 1.63% | 0.65% | 0.98% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors N.V. Common Stock | 1.95% | 0.29% | 1.66% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.27% | 0.81% | 0.46% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.42% | 0.37% | 1.05% |
22.9% of QQQG is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or VYM?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQG or VYM?
Over the past year QQQG returned +30.40% vs +17.57% for VYM, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +20.72% vs +17.15% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQG or VYM?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 10.2% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both QQQG and VYM?
QQQG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and VYM?
22.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 14.3% of VYM's is in holdings QQQG also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or VYM?
QQQG yields 0.05% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QQQG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.