QQQG vs VYM
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQQG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $45M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +27.97% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.74% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QQQG vs VYM Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQG returned +36.74% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, QQQG is up 27.97% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.05% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QQQG and VYM share 11 holdings out of 643 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or VYM?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQG or VYM?
Over the past year QQQG returned +36.74% vs +23.24% for VYM, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +22.61% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQG or VYM?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QQQG and VYM?
QQQG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and VYM?
QQQG and VYM share 11 common holdings with a 8.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 643 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or VYM?
QQQG yields 0.05% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.