QQQG vs VXUS
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. QQQG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $20M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +31.21% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.04% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QQQG vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQG returned +36.04% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, QQQG is up 31.21% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $5 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.05% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QQQG and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7912 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or VXUS?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQG or VXUS?
Over the past year QQQG returned +36.04% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +24.45% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQG or VXUS?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QQQG and VXUS?
QQQG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and VXUS?
QQQG and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7912 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or VXUS?
QQQG yields 0.05% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.