IVV vs RGEF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Rockefeller Global Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. RGEF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RGEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $838M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.96% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 71 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +13.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +23.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Rockefeller Capital Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 25, 2024 |
IVV vs RGEF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) is a ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while RGEF returned +23.99%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 13.92% for RGEF.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.8% for RGEF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.0% for RGEF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RGEF charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.96% for RGEF.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RGEF share 29 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RGEF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RGEF charges 0.55%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RGEF?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +23.99% for RGEF, so RGEF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +21.23% for RGEF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RGEF?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.8% for RGEF. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RGEF -16.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and RGEF?
IVV and RGEF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RGEF?
IVV and RGEF share 29 common holdings with a 29.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RGEF?
IVV yields 1.10% while RGEF yields 0.96%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.