IVV vs RGEF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Rockefeller Global Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or RGEF?
RGEF has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. RGEF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. RGEF is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RGEF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $817M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 508 | 71 |
| YTD Return | +11.57% | +12.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +20.75%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 11.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -16.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,399 | $14,122Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 35.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Rockefeller Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 25, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 28, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.9 years).
IVV vs RGEF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RGEF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) is an ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while RGEF returned +20.75%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 12.87% for RGEF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 11.7% for RGEF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -16.0% for RGEF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RGEF charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.95% for RGEF.
Holdings Overlap
41.4% of IVV's money is in holdings RGEF also owns. 54.0% of RGEF's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
29 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 66 in RGEF, against full books of 508 and 71.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 5 positions for RGEF that do not appear in our book for IVV (8.1% of the fund), and 466 for IVV that do not appear in RGEF (57.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RGEF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 3.92% | 4.06% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 4.53% | 0.91% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 2.14% | 4.72% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.19% | 5.46% | 2.27% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 3.47% | 0.54% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.18% | 3.84% | 2.66% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.94% | 2.62% | 0.68% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 1.36% | 1.62% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.45% | 1.87% | 0.42% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.64% | 2.49% | 1.85% |
54.0% of RGEF is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RGEF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RGEF charges 0.55%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RGEF?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +20.75% for RGEF, so RGEF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +16.65% vs +19.92% for RGEF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RGEF?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 11.7% for RGEF. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs RGEF -16.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and RGEF?
IVV and RGEF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RGEF?
54.0% of RGEF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 54.0% of RGEF's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 66 in RGEF.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RGEF?
IVV yields 1.06% while RGEF yields 0.95%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RGEF better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. RGEF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. RGEF is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.