IVV vs ROUS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or ROUS?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, ROUS over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. ROUS is less concentrated, with 11.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ROUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.19% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $744M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.31% |
| Holdings | 508 | 325 |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +16.20%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | +19.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38%Best | +19.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51%Best | +12.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -35.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,844Best | $18,028 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 11.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 25, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 26, 2015 to Sep 18, 2026 (11.6 years).
IVV vs ROUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs ROUS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is an ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while ROUS returned +19.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 16.20% for ROUS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +19.21% for ROUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.51% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.47% annualized vs +9.78%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.6% for ROUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -35.5% for ROUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ROUS charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $19 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.31% for ROUS.
Holdings Overlap
70.8% of IVV's money is in holdings ROUS also owns. 78.5% of ROUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of ROUS is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
227 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 321 in ROUS, against full books of 508 and 325.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 88 positions for ROUS that do not appear in our book for IVV (20.4% of the fund), and 255 for IVV that do not appear in ROUS (27.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in ROUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 0.71% | 7.36% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 1.00% | 6.02% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 0.95% | 4.74% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 1.35% | 1.65% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 0.25% | 3.59% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 0.36% | 2.29% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 0.94% | 0.69% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 0.49% | 1.41% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.66% | 1.25% | 0.59% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 0.94% | 0.03% |
78.5% of ROUS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ROUS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ROUS charges 0.19%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or ROUS?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +19.34% for ROUS, so ROUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +12.47% vs +9.78% for ROUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or ROUS?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.6% for ROUS. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs ROUS -35.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and ROUS?
IVV and ROUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ROUS?
78.5% of ROUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 78.5% of ROUS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 227 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 321 in ROUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ROUS?
IVV yields 1.06% while ROUS yields 1.31%, so ROUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ROUS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, ROUS over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. ROUS is less concentrated, with 11.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.