IVV vs SCHK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Schwab 1000 Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or SCHK?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. SCHK is less concentrated, with 35.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SCHK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Tie | 0.03%Tie |
| AUM | $886.7B | $5.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 508 | 986 |
| YTD Return | +13.39% | +13.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +19.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29%Best | +21.15% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88%Best | +12.15% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2%Best | 16.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -34.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,327Best | $17,742 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 35.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 11, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (8.9 years).
IVV vs SCHK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SCHK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while SCHK returned +19.82%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 13.54% for SCHK.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +21.15% for SCHK; over five years the annualized figures are +12.88% and +12.15% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.18% annualized vs +13.91%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 16.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -34.8% for SCHK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SCHK charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.04% for SCHK.
Holdings Overlap
99.3% of IVV's money is in holdings SCHK also owns. 92.0% of SCHK's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of IVV is already inside SCHK. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
495 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 983 in SCHK, against full books of 508 and 986.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 432 positions for SCHK that do not appear in our book for IVV (7.3% of the fund), and 6 for IVV that do not appear in SCHK (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SCHK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 7.40% | 0.58% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 6.40% | 0.46% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 5.18% | 0.26% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 3.72% | 0.29% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 3.19% | 2.93% | 0.26% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 2.78% | 0.20% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.56% | 2.35% | 0.21% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.94% | 1.81% | 0.13% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 1.39% | 0.12% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.45% | 1.33% | 0.12% |
99.3% of IVV is already inside SCHK.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SCHK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SCHK charges 0.03%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, IVV or SCHK?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +19.82% for SCHK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +14.18% vs +13.91% for SCHK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SCHK?
SCHK has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 16.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs SCHK -34.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SCHK?
IVV and SCHK have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SCHK?
99.3% of IVV's money is in holdings SCHK also owns. 92.0% of SCHK's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 495 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 983 in SCHK.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SCHK?
IVV yields 1.10% while SCHK yields 1.04%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHK better than IVV?
IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. SCHK is less concentrated, with 35.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.