IVV vs SCHV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF
Which is better, IVV or SCHV?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. SCHV is less concentrated, with 20.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SCHV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.04% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $15.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.77% |
| Holdings | 508 | 560 |
| YTD Return | +14.14% | +15.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.30% | +19.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.04%Best | +18.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.63%Best | +10.91% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -37.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,944Best | $16,782 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 20.4%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 11, 2009 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 11, 2009 to Sep 22, 2026 (16.8 years).
IVV vs SCHV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SCHV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% while SCHV returned +19.82%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.14% versus a gain of 15.33% for SCHV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.04% per year against +18.58% for SCHV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.63% and +10.91% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.80% annualized vs +9.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 14.1% for SCHV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -37.1% for SCHV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SCHV charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $4 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.77% for SCHV.
Holdings Overlap
43.4% of IVV's money is in holdings SCHV also owns. 90.6% of SCHV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of SCHV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
358 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 555 in SCHV, against full books of 508 and 560.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 183 positions for SCHV that do not appear in our book for IVV (8.6% of the fund), and 127 for IVV that do not appear in SCHV (55.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SCHV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 3.41% | 1.78% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.44% | 3.01% | 1.57% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.39% | 2.91% | 1.52% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.01% | 2.10% | 1.09% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 2.02% | 1.05% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.69% | 1.45% | 0.76% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.68% | 1.43% | 0.75% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.67% | 1.39% | 0.72% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.66% | 1.38% | 0.72% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.61% | 1.27% | 0.66% |
90.6% of SCHV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SCHV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SCHV charges 0.04%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SCHV?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% vs +19.82% for SCHV, so SCHV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IVV annualized +12.80% vs +9.49% for SCHV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SCHV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 14.1% for SCHV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs SCHV -37.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and SCHV?
IVV and SCHV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SCHV?
90.6% of SCHV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 90.6% of SCHV's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 358 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 555 in SCHV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SCHV?
IVV yields 1.06% while SCHV yields 1.77%, so SCHV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. SCHV is less concentrated, with 20.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.