IVV vs SCLZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SCLZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $19M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 8.01% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 90 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +4.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +9.74% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -12.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Swan Capital Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 26, 2024 |
IVV vs SCLZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) is a ETF from Swan Capital Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while SCLZ returned +9.74%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 4.27% for SCLZ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.9% for SCLZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -12.6% for SCLZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SCLZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 8.01% for SCLZ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SCLZ share 55 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.7% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SCLZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SCLZ charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SCLZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +9.74% for SCLZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +9.27% for SCLZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SCLZ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.9% for SCLZ. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SCLZ -12.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and SCLZ?
IVV and SCLZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SCLZ?
IVV and SCLZ share 55 common holdings with a 53.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SCLZ?
IVV yields 1.09% while SCLZ yields 8.01%, so SCLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.