SCLZ vs VYM
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SCLZ or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCLZ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.11% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 117 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +5.25% | +11.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.97% | +15.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8%Best | 10.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -14.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $12,586 | $14,855Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Swan Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 26, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 27, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026 (2.6 years).
SCLZ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
SCLZ vs VYM Performance
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) is an ETF from Swan Capital Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCLZ returned +6.97% while VYM returned +15.94%. Year to date, SCLZ is up 5.25% versus a gain of 11.47% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.6% compared with 7.8% for SCLZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for SCLZ and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCLZ charges 0.79% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $4 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCLZ currently yields 8.11% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
31.5% of SCLZ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 39.8% of VYM's money is in holdings SCLZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
32 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in SCLZ and 557 in VYM, against full books of 117 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 497 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SCLZ (57.5% of the fund), and 39 for SCLZ that do not appear in VYM (70.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCLZ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.26% | 7.35% | 4.09% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.24% | 3.82% | 0.58% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.00% | 2.51% | 0.51% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.56% | 2.63% | 1.07% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.97% | 1.86% | 0.11% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 1.92% | 1.50% | 0.42% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.36% | 1.80% | 0.44% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.25% | 1.52% | 0.27% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.16% | 1.48% | 0.32% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.15% | 1.31% | 0.16% |
39.8% of VYM is already inside SCLZ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCLZ or VYM?
SCLZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $75 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCLZ or VYM?
Over the past year SCLZ returned +6.97% vs +15.94% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCLZ or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.6% annualized versus 7.8% for SCLZ. Worst drawdown: SCLZ -12.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both SCLZ and VYM?
SCLZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCLZ and VYM?
39.8% of VYM's money is in holdings SCLZ also owns. 39.8% of VYM's is in holdings SCLZ also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in SCLZ and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCLZ or VYM?
SCLZ yields 8.11% while VYM yields 2.22%, so SCLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SCLZ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.