IVV vs SEMI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Columbia Select Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SEMI delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SEMI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $886.7B | $41M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.76% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 36 | |
| YTD Return | +12.92% | +23.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.22% | +41.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.95% | +25.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 29.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -32.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 29, 2022 |
IVV vs SEMI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) is a ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +21.22% while SEMI returned +41.05%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.92% versus a gain of 23.46% for SEMI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.95% per year against +25.25% for SEMI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SEMI has the edge at +17.57% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SEMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -32.9% for SEMI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SEMI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.76% for SEMI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SEMI share 31 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 43.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SEMI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SEMI charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SEMI?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.22% vs +41.05% for SEMI, so SEMI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +17.57% for SEMI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SEMI?
SEMI has been the more volatile fund at 29.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SEMI -32.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and SEMI?
IVV and SEMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SEMI?
IVV and SEMI share 31 common holdings with a 43.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SEMI?
IVV yields 1.10% while SEMI yields 3.76%, so SEMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.