IVV vs SGRT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SGRT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SGRT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $54M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.11% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 23 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +27.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +62.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 37.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -25.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | SMART Wealth, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 20, 2025 |
IVV vs SGRT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) is a ETF from SMART Wealth, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while SGRT returned +62.38%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 27.75% for SGRT.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SGRT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -25.0% for SGRT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SGRT charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.11% for SGRT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SGRT share 11 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SGRT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SGRT charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SGRT?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +62.38% for SGRT, so SGRT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SGRT?
SGRT has been the more volatile fund at 37.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SGRT -25.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and SGRT?
IVV and SGRT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SGRT?
IVV and SGRT share 11 common holdings with a 4.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SGRT?
IVV yields 1.09% while SGRT yields 0.11%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.