IVV vs SGRT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
Which is better, IVV or SGRT?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SGRT led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SGRT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $57M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.13% |
| Holdings | 508 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +13.86% | +25.97%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.57% | +55.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.48% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 36.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -25.0% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $12,174 | $15,740Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 70.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | SMART Wealth, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 20, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2025 to Sep 3, 2026 (1 years).
IVV vs SGRT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SGRT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) is an ETF from SMART Wealth, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +21.57% while SGRT returned +55.33%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.86% versus a gain of 25.97% for SGRT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SGRT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.4% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -25.0% for SGRT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SGRT charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.13% for SGRT.
Holdings Overlap
5.6% of IVV's money is in holdings SGRT also owns. 71.2% of SGRT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of SGRT is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
13 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 24 in SGRT, against full books of 508 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 24 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 484 positions SGRT does not, 93.8% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SGRT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 9.67% | 8.16% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.39% | 9.67% | 8.28% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 0.20% | 10.28% | 10.08% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 0.27% | 10.01% | 9.74% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.18% | 4.55% | 3.37% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 0.09% | 5.21% | 5.12% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.13% | 4.42% | 4.29% |
| PWRQuanta | 0.15% | 4.28% | 4.13% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.14% | 3.63% | 3.49% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 0.09% | 3.14% | 3.05% |
71.2% of SGRT is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SGRT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SGRT charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SGRT?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.57% vs +55.33% for SGRT, so SGRT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +21.74% vs +57.40% for SGRT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SGRT?
SGRT has been the more volatile fund at 36.4% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs SGRT -25.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and SGRT?
IVV and SGRT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SGRT?
71.2% of SGRT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 71.2% of SGRT's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 24 in SGRT.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SGRT?
IVV yields 1.10% while SGRT yields 0.13%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SGRT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SGRT led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.