IVV vs SPUS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SPUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SPUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $2.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.72% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 216 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +15.49% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +27.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +23.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +15.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -30.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | SP Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 17, 2019 |
IVV vs SPUS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is a ETF from SP Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while SPUS returned +27.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 15.49% for SPUS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +23.72% for SPUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.39% and +15.43% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SPUS has the edge at +18.50% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -30.8% for SPUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SPUS charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.72% for SPUS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SPUS share 214 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 57.0% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SPUS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SPUS charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SPUS?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +27.17% for SPUS, so SPUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +18.50% for SPUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SPUS?
SPUS has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SPUS -30.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SPUS?
IVV and SPUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SPUS?
IVV and SPUS share 214 common holdings with a 57.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SPUS?
IVV yields 1.09% while SPUS yields 0.72%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.