IVV vs SQS

IVV vs SQS

Which is better, IVV or SQS?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVSQS
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.80%
AUM$876.4B$1.4B
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50837
YTD Return+11.57%Best+10.25%
1Y Return+17.57%-
3Y Return (annualized)+20.71%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.80%-
Top 10 Weight37.9%Best55.4%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Sapient Capital, LLC
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Mar 13, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs SQS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs SQS Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) is an ETF from Sapient Capital, LLC. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 10.25% for SQS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while SQS charges 0.80%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $80 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for SQS.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in SQS43.0%
SQS already in IVV92.8%

43.0% of IVV's money is in holdings SQS also owns. 92.8% of SQS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

Most of SQS is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

31 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 36 in SQS, against full books of 508 and 37.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 3 positions for SQS that do not appear in our book for IVV (3.9% of the fund), and 464 for IVV that do not appear in SQS (56.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in SQSDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.7.98%9.60%1.62%
AAPLApple, Inc6.86%7.02%0.16%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 375.44%5.26%0.18%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0013.19%7.45%4.26%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.01%5.45%1.44%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.98%4.10%1.12%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.39%5.04%3.65%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.51%3.91%2.40%
JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co.1.45%3.40%1.95%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.1.94%2.32%0.38%

92.8% of SQS is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVSQS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or SQS?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SQS charges 0.80%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SQS?

92.8% of SQS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 92.8% of SQS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 36 in SQS.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SQS?

IVV yields 1.06% while SQS yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SQS better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.