IVV vs STXF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strive 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. STXF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | STXF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.19% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 506 | |
| YTD Return | +12.76% | +12.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.63% | +20.76% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.71% | +21.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.87% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strive Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 15, 2022 |
IVV vs STXF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strive 500 ETF (STXF) is a ETF from Strive Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.63% while STXF returned +20.76%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.76% versus a gain of 12.91% for STXF.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.71% per year against +21.95% for STXF. Across the full 4-year window we track, STXF has the edge at +20.76% annualized vs +6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.4% for STXF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.0% for STXF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while STXF charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.19% for STXF.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and STXF share 419 holdings out of 591 unique holdings combined, representing a 92.3% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or STXF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while STXF charges 0.05%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or STXF?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.63% vs +20.76% for STXF, so STXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +6.99% vs +20.76% for STXF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or STXF?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.4% for STXF. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs STXF -19.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and STXF?
IVV and STXF have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and STXF?
IVV and STXF share 419 common holdings with a 92.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 591 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or STXF?
IVV yields 1.10% while STXF yields 1.19%, so STXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.