IVV vs TEK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TEK delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TEK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $43M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.33% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 58 | |
| YTD Return | +13.25% | +27.37% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.95% | +32.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.26% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.82% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 31.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -28.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 21, 2024 |
IVV vs TEK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +19.95% while TEK returned +32.46%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.25% versus a gain of 27.37% for TEK.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TEK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -28.2% for TEK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TEK charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.33% for TEK.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TEK share 33 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 36.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TEK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TEK charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TEK?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.95% vs +32.46% for TEK, so TEK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs +27.03% for TEK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TEK?
TEK has been the more volatile fund at 31.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TEK -28.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and TEK?
IVV and TEK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TEK?
IVV and TEK share 33 common holdings with a 36.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TEK?
IVV yields 1.10% while TEK yields 1.33%, so TEK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.