IVV vs THMR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF
Which is better, IVV or THMR?
Large Cap Blend against Tactical Allocation.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | THMR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.10% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $47M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 30 |
| YTD Return | +13.23%Best | +3.99% |
| 1Y Return | +17.38% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.67% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.13% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 73.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Thor Financial Technologies |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Tactical Allocation |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 9, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs THMR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs THMR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF (THMR) is an ETF from Thor Financial Technologies. Year to date, IVV is up 13.23% versus a gain of 3.99% for THMR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while THMR charges 1.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $110 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for THMR.
Holdings Overlap
34.6% of IVV's money is in holdings THMR also owns. 31.1% of THMR's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in THMR, against full books of 508 and 30.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 30 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 467 positions THMR does not, 64.1% of the fund.
Largest: GOOGL 3.00%, META 1.90%, MU 1.63%, TSLA 1.56%, JPM 1.44%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in THMR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 5.80% | 2.27% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 2.97% | 4.05% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 2.77% | 2.92% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 4.29% | 1.64% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 2.20% | 1.64% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.01% | 3.69% | 2.68% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 2.90% | 1.52% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 1.69% | 0.70% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.65% | 2.61% | 1.96% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 0.18% | 2.13% | 1.95% |
34.6% of IVV is already inside THMR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or THMR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while THMR charges 1.10%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $107 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and THMR?
34.6% of IVV's money is in holdings THMR also owns. 31.1% of THMR's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in THMR.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or THMR?
IVV yields 1.06% while THMR yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THMR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.