IVV vs THQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. THQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | THQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.46% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $784M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 10.84% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 111 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +8.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +40.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +11.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +4.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -45.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Aberdeen | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 28, 2014 |
IVV vs THQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ) is a ETF from Aberdeen. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while THQ returned +40.14%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 8.44% for THQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +11.72% for THQ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +4.38% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +3.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
THQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -45.8% for THQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while THQ charges 1.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $146 annually, a gap of $143 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 10.84% for THQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and THQ share 28 holdings out of 575 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or THQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while THQ charges 1.46%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $143 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or THQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +40.14% for THQ, so THQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +3.86% for THQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or THQ?
THQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs THQ -45.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and THQ?
IVV and THQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and THQ?
IVV and THQ share 28 common holdings with a 7.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 575 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or THQ?
IVV yields 1.09% while THQ yields 10.84%, so THQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.