IVV vs THW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Abrdn World Healthcare Fund
Which is better, IVV or THW?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, THW over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | THW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 3.00% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $483M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 10.27% |
| Holdings | 508 | 123 |
| YTD Return | +12.70% | +18.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.36% | +29.27%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.16%Best | +14.69% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.75%Best | +6.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2%Best | 20.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -55.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,221Best | $13,759 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Aberdeen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 26, 2015 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2015 to Sep 8, 2026 (11.2 years).
IVV vs THW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs THW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) is an ETF from Aberdeen. Over the past year IVV returned +19.36% while THW returned +29.27%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.70% versus a gain of 18.83% for THW.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +14.69% for THW; over five years the annualized figures are +12.75% and +6.59% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.00% annualized vs +2.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
THW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -55.7% for THW. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while THW charges 3.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $300 annually, a gap of $297 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 10.27% for THW.
Holdings Overlap
At least 6.9% of IVV's money is in holdings THW also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for THW, our book for it lists positions totalling 118.6% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
IVV and THW share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 217 days apart, IVV as of Aug 5, 2026 and THW as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
27 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 96 in THW, against full books of 508 and 123.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in THW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.65% | 3.85% | 3.20% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.48% | 3.56% | 3.08% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.28% | 3.63% | 3.35% |
| DHRDanaher Corporation | 0.19% | 3.10% | 2.91% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc | 0.20% | 2.85% | 2.65% |
| MDTMEDTRONIC | 0.17% | 2.73% | 2.56% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.39% | 1.48% | 0.09% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 0.32% | 2.03% | 1.71% |
| BSXBoston Scientific Corp. | 0.11% | 1.77% | 1.66% |
| VTRVentas, Inc. | 0.07% | 1.79% | 1.72% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and THW you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or THW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while THW charges 3.00%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $297 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or THW?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.36% vs +29.27% for THW, so THW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +13.00% vs +2.02% for THW. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or THW?
THW has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs THW -55.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and THW?
IVV and THW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and THW?
At least 6.9% of IVV's money is in holdings THW also owns. Our book for THW is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 96 in THW.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or THW?
IVV yields 1.10% while THW yields 10.27%, so THW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THW better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, THW over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.