IVV vs TMFE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TMFE delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TMFE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $81M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.18% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 101 | |
| YTD Return | +12.76% | +34.98% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.63% | +39.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.71% | +12.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.87% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 20.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -31.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Motley Fool Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 30, 2021 |
IVV vs TMFE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF (TMFE) is a ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.63% while TMFE returned +39.12%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.76% versus a gain of 34.98% for TMFE.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.71% per year against +12.14% for TMFE. Across the full 3-year window we track, TMFE has the edge at +12.14% annualized vs +6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMFE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -31.1% for TMFE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TMFE charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.18% for TMFE.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TMFE share 59 holdings out of 546 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TMFE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TMFE charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TMFE?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.63% vs +39.12% for TMFE, so TMFE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +6.99% vs +12.14% for TMFE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TMFE?
TMFE has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TMFE -31.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and TMFE?
IVV and TMFE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TMFE?
IVV and TMFE share 59 common holdings with a 26.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 546 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TMFE?
IVV yields 1.10% while TMFE yields 0.18%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.