IVV vs TRFM

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. TRFM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: TRFMMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTRFMWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.49%
AUM$865.2B$244M
Dividend Yield1.09%0.13%
Holdings508246
YTD Return+13.80%+26.12%
1Y Return+23.70%+39.25%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+28.99%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%24.2%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-28.4%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jul 11, 2022

IVV vs TRFM Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while TRFM returned +39.25%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 26.12% for TRFM.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +28.99% for TRFM. Across the full 4-year window we track, TRFM has the edge at +26.41% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TRFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -28.4% for TRFM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TRFM charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.13% for TRFM.

Holdings Overlap

19.3%overlap

IVV and TRFM share 74 holdings out of 676 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in TRFMDifference
NVDA7.76%0.74%7.02%
AAPL7.44%0.66%6.78%
MSFT4.57%0.63%3.94%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
TSLAProProPro
AMDProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with TRFM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TRFM?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TRFM charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or TRFM?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +39.25% for TRFM, so TRFM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +26.41% for TRFM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or TRFM?

TRFM has been the more volatile fund at 24.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TRFM -28.4%.

Should I hold both IVV and TRFM?

IVV and TRFM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TRFM?

IVV and TRFM share 74 common holdings with a 19.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 676 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TRFM?

IVV yields 1.09% while TRFM yields 0.13%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →