IVV vs TRFM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AAM Transformers ETF
Which is better, IVV or TRFM?
TRFM has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TRFM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. TRFM is less concentrated, with 8.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TRFM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $264M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.14% |
| Holdings | 508 | 313 |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +19.52%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | +19.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | +28.14%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3%Best | 23.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -28.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $21,274 | $24,673Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 8.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 11, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 12, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.2 years).
IVV vs TRFM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TRFM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while TRFM returned +19.61%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 19.52% for TRFM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +28.14% for TRFM. Across the full 4-year window we track, TRFM has the edge at +23.99% annualized vs +19.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TRFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 14.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -28.4% for TRFM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TRFM charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.14% for TRFM.
Holdings Overlap
51.0% of IVV's money is in holdings TRFM also owns. 46.9% of TRFM's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
85 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 309 in TRFM, against full books of 508 and 313.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 165 positions for TRFM that do not appear in our book for IVV (37.4% of the fund), and 397 for IVV that do not appear in TRFM (47.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TRFM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 0.59% | 7.48% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 0.60% | 6.42% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 0.70% | 4.99% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 0.60% | 3.24% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 0.54% | 2.46% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 0.52% | 2.13% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 0.54% | 1.36% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 0.57% | 1.06% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 0.52% | 1.04% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 0.53% | 0.63% |
51.0% of IVV is already inside TRFM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TRFM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TRFM charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TRFM?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +19.61% for TRFM, so TRFM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +19.69% vs +23.99% for TRFM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TRFM?
TRFM has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 14.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TRFM -28.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and TRFM?
IVV and TRFM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TRFM?
51.0% of IVV's money is in holdings TRFM also owns. 46.9% of TRFM's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 85 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 309 in TRFM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TRFM?
IVV yields 1.06% while TRFM yields 0.14%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TRFM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TRFM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. TRFM is less concentrated, with 8.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.