IVV vs TTEQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
Which is better, IVV or TTEQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TTEQ led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TTEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.63% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $439M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 85 |
| YTD Return | +11.57% | +26.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +33.67%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9%Best | 27.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -27.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,415 | $16,631Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 48.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 23, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.9 years).
IVV vs TTEQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TTEQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while TTEQ returned +33.67%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 26.67% for TTEQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TTEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.8% compared with 12.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -27.0% for TTEQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TTEQ charges 0.63%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $63 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TTEQ.
Holdings Overlap
44.1% of IVV's money is in holdings TTEQ also owns. 55.8% of TTEQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
31 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 70 in TTEQ, against full books of 508 and 85.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 15 positions for TTEQ that do not appear in our book for IVV (10.0% of the fund), and 464 for IVV that do not appear in TTEQ (55.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TTEQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 10.72% | 2.74% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 3.14% | 3.72% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 5.93% | 2.95% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 1.03% | 4.41% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 2.35% | 1.66% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.19% | 2.46% | 0.73% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 0.72% | 4.21% | 3.49% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 3.26% | 1.75% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.56% | 2.18% | 0.38% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.94% | 1.54% | 0.40% |
55.8% of TTEQ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TTEQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TTEQ charges 0.63%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TTEQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +33.67% for TTEQ, so TTEQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +16.72% vs +30.70% for TTEQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TTEQ?
TTEQ has been the more volatile fund at 27.8% annualized versus 12.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TTEQ -27.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and TTEQ?
IVV and TTEQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TTEQ?
55.8% of TTEQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 55.8% of TTEQ's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 70 in TTEQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TTEQ?
IVV yields 1.06% while TTEQ yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TTEQ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TTEQ led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.