IVV vs TUGN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or TUGN?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, TUGN over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TUGN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $85M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 11.55% |
| Holdings | 508 | 102 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 17.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -23.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $20,975Best | $17,995 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 45.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Gateway Credit Partners |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 18, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 29 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 18, 2026 and TUGN through Aug 20, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 19, 2022 to Aug 20, 2026 (4.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TUGN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -23.4% for TUGN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TUGN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 11.55% for TUGN.
Holdings Overlap
53.5% of IVV's money is in holdings TUGN also owns. 91.8% of TUGN's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of TUGN is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
86 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 98 in TUGN, against full books of 508 and 102.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for TUGN that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.6% of the fund), and 396 for IVV that do not appear in TUGN (45.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TUGN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 7.85% | 0.22% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 8.48% | 1.46% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 4.94% | 0.75% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 3.92% | 0.08% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 3.33% | 0.33% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 3.18% | 0.53% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 4.16% | 2.53% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 3.08% | 0.69% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.29% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 3.51% | 2.35% |
91.8% of TUGN is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TUGN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TUGN charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or TUGN?
TUGN has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TUGN -23.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and TUGN?
IVV and TUGN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TUGN?
91.8% of TUGN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 91.8% of TUGN's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 86 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 98 in TUGN.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TUGN?
IVV yields 1.06% while TUGN yields 11.55%, so TUGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TUGN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, TUGN over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.