IVV vs TUGN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TUGN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TUGN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $85M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 11.55% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 102 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +15.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +23.33% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +20.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -23.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Gateway Credit Partners | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 18, 2022 |
IVV vs TUGN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) is a ETF from Gateway Credit Partners. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while TUGN returned +23.33%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 15.74% for TUGN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +20.58% for TUGN. Across the full 4-year window we track, TUGN has the edge at +14.64% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TUGN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.4% for TUGN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TUGN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 11.55% for TUGN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TUGN share 86 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 52.9% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TUGN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TUGN charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TUGN?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +23.33% for TUGN, so TUGN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +14.64% for TUGN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TUGN?
TUGN has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TUGN -23.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and TUGN?
IVV and TUGN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TUGN?
IVV and TUGN share 86 common holdings with a 52.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TUGN?
IVV yields 1.10% while TUGN yields 11.55%, so TUGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.