IVV vs VNSE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF
Which is better, IVV or VNSE?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VNSE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.80% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $14M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.20% |
| Holdings | 508 | 29 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +5.81% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +7.90% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +12.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | +8.09% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 16.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -24.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $14,755 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 54.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Natixis Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 17, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 17, 2020 to Sep 10, 2026 (6 years).
IVV vs VNSE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs VNSE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF (VNSE) is an ETF from Natixis Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while VNSE returned +7.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 5.81% for VNSE.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +12.10% for VNSE; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +8.09% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +16.07% annualized vs +13.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VNSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -24.2% for VNSE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VNSE charges 0.80%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $80 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.20% for VNSE.
Holdings Overlap
31.5% of IVV's money is in holdings VNSE also owns. 77.8% of VNSE's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of VNSE is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in VNSE, against full books of 508 and 29.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for VNSE that do not appear in our book for IVV (6.0% of the fund), and 475 for IVV that do not appear in VNSE (67.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in VNSE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 8.79% | 0.81% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 4.51% | 2.35% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.19% | 6.56% | 3.37% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 4.87% | 0.86% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.39% | 6.53% | 5.14% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.94% | 5.47% | 4.53% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.45% | 3.43% | 1.98% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.94% | 2.37% | 0.43% |
| VVisa Inc | 0.92% | 3.12% | 2.20% |
| CMICummins Inc. | 0.13% | 3.80% | 3.67% |
77.8% of VNSE is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VNSE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VNSE charges 0.80%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or VNSE?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +7.90% for VNSE, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +16.07% vs +13.37% for VNSE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or VNSE?
VNSE has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs VNSE -24.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and VNSE?
IVV and VNSE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VNSE?
77.8% of VNSE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 77.8% of VNSE's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in VNSE.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VNSE?
IVV yields 1.06% while VNSE yields 0.20%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VNSE better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.