IVV vs VOOG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
Which is better, IVV or VOOG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, VOOG over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VOOG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.07% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $26.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.45% |
| Holdings | 508 | 156 |
| YTD Return | +11.51% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.96%Best | +15.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.01% | +25.55%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.66% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Best | 15.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -32.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,149 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 59.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 15, 2026 (16 years).
IVV vs VOOG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
IVV vs VOOG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVV returned +15.96% while VOOG returned +15.09%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.51% versus a gain of 11.83% for VOOG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.01% per year against +25.55% for VOOG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.66% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOOG has the edge at +15.58% annualized vs +13.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -32.7% for VOOG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VOOG charges 0.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $7 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.45% for VOOG.
Holdings Overlap
66.9% of IVV's money is in holdings VOOG also owns. 99.2% of VOOG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of VOOG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
142 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 148 in VOOG, against full books of 508 and 156.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 5 positions for VOOG that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.6% of the fund), and 341 for IVV that do not appear in VOOG (31.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in VOOG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 13.93% | 5.86% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 9.89% | 4.20% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 6.50% | 0.52% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 5.98% | 2.98% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 5.28% | 2.63% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 4.04% | 0.20% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 4.83% | 2.44% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 3.50% | 1.60% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 2.66% | 1.03% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.39% | 2.69% | 1.30% |
99.2% of VOOG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VOOG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VOOG charges 0.07%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or VOOG?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.96% vs +15.09% for VOOG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVV annualized +13.29% vs +15.58% for VOOG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or VOOG?
VOOG has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs VOOG -32.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and VOOG?
IVV and VOOG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VOOG?
99.2% of VOOG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 99.2% of VOOG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 142 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 148 in VOOG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VOOG?
IVV yields 1.06% while VOOG yields 0.45%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOOG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, VOOG over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.