IVV vs XNTK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. XNTK delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XNTK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $2.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.16% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 37 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +27.99% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +50.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +37.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +18.53% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 26.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -76.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 25, 2000 |
IVV vs XNTK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while XNTK returned +50.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 27.99% for XNTK.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +37.72% for XNTK; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +18.53% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, XNTK has the edge at +8.20% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XNTK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -76.3% for XNTK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XNTK charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.16% for XNTK.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and XNTK share 30 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XNTK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XNTK charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or XNTK?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +50.78% for XNTK, so XNTK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +8.20% for XNTK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or XNTK?
XNTK has been the more volatile fund at 26.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XNTK -76.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and XNTK?
IVV and XNTK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XNTK?
IVV and XNTK share 30 common holdings with a 28.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XNTK?
IVV yields 1.10% while XNTK yields 0.16%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.