IWFG vs SPY
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWFG | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $59M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +5.28% | +14.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.05% | +21.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.75% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | New York Life Investments | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2022 | Jan 22, 1993 |
IWFG vs SPY Performance
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) is a ETF from New York Life Investments and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IWFG returned +6.05% while SPY returned +21.96%. Year to date, IWFG is up 5.28% versus a gain of 14.47% for SPY.
Over three years, IWFG compounded at +22.75% per year against +21.70% for SPY. Across the full 4-year window we track, IWFG has the edge at +23.06% annualized vs +8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.0% for IWFG and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWFG charges 0.46% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $9 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWFG currently yields 0.00% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
IWFG and SPY share 25 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 36.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWFG or SPY?
IWFG has an expense ratio of 0.46% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IWFG or SPY?
Over the past year IWFG returned +6.05% vs +21.96% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IWFG annualized +23.06% vs +8.87% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IWFG or SPY?
IWFG has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: IWFG -22.0% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both IWFG and SPY?
IWFG and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IWFG and SPY?
IWFG and SPY share 25 common holdings with a 36.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWFG or SPY?
IWFG yields 0.00% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.