IWY vs VTI
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IWY or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IWY led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15.7B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 105 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.77% | +11.53%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.13% | +15.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.48%Best | +20.67% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.53%Best | +11.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,044Best | $17,303 |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 22, 2009 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2009 to Sep 15, 2026 (17 years).
IWY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17 years both funds cover.
IWY vs VTI Performance
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWY returned +5.13% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, IWY is up 2.77% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Over three years, IWY compounded at +21.48% per year against +20.67% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.53% and +11.59% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IWY has the edge at +15.60% annualized vs +12.59%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 14.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for IWY and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWY charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWY currently yields 0.35% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.0% of IWY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 55.0% of VTI's money is in holdings IWY also owns.
Most of IWY is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
96 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in IWY and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 105 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,054 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IWY (42.4% of the fund), and 5 for IWY that do not appear in VTI (0.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IWY | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 15.83% | 6.40% | 9.43% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.92% | 6.29% | 1.63% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.28% | 4.79% | 1.49% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 6.13% | 2.90% | 3.23% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.60% | 2.56% | 3.04% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 4.94% | 2.31% | 2.63% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.78% | 1.70% | 2.08% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.10% | 1.29% | 2.81% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 4.06% | 1.22% | 2.84% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.27% | 1.35% | 1.92% |
99.0% of IWY is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWY or VTI?
IWY has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IWY or VTI?
Over the past year IWY returned +5.13% vs +15.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IWY annualized +15.60% vs +12.59% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IWY or VTI?
IWY has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 14.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IWY -32.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both IWY and VTI?
IWY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IWY and VTI?
99.0% of IWY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 55.0% of VTI's is in holdings IWY also owns. They hold 96 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in IWY and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWY or VTI?
IWY yields 0.35% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IWY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IWY led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.