IXN vs VTI
iShares Global Tech ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IXN or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IXN led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IXN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9.7B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.78% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 142 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +43.65%Best | +13.35% |
| 1Y Return | +46.27%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +39.34%Best | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.01%Best | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.3%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $28,165Best | $18,286 |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2001 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2001 to Oct 2, 2026 (24.9 years).
IXN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 24.9 years both funds cover.
IXN vs VTI Performance
iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IXN returned +46.27% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, IXN is up 43.65% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, IXN compounded at +39.34% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +23.01% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, IXN has the edge at +12.06% annualized vs +8.65%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IXN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.3% for IXN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IXN charges 0.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IXN currently yields 0.78% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
76.7% of IXN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 31.9% of VTI's money is in holdings IXN also owns.
Most of IXN is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
70 positions in common, counted across the 127 positions we hold weights for in IXN and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 142 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,080 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IXN (65.5% of the fund), and 6 for IXN that do not appear in VTI (4.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IXN | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 14.40% | 6.40% | 8.00% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 13.28% | 6.29% | 6.99% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 10.03% | 4.79% | 5.24% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.66% | 2.56% | 2.10% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.99% | 1.29% | 2.70% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.05% | 1.08% | 1.97% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.84% | 0.50% | 1.34% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.60% | 0.57% | 1.03% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.31% | 0.56% | 0.75% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.35% | 0.51% | 0.84% |
76.7% of IXN is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IXN or VTI?
IXN has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IXN or VTI?
Over the past year IXN returned +46.27% vs +15.92% for VTI, so IXN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IXN annualized +12.06% vs +8.65% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IXN or VTI?
IXN has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IXN -56.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IXN and VTI?
IXN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IXN and VTI?
76.7% of IXN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 31.9% of VTI's is in holdings IXN also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 127 positions we hold weights for in IXN and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IXN or VTI?
IXN yields 0.78% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IXN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IXN led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.